In tonights game one of the Anaheim Ducks / Detroit Red WingsNHLStanley Cup Playoffs, Western Conference semi final, Mike Brown of the Ducks leveled a crushing hit up high to the Red Wings Jiri Hudler at 11:29 of the 1st period. Brown was assessed a 5 minute major for interferance, and a game misconduct.(ejection) Brown came in late, well after Hudler at passed the puck away. Hudler suffered severe cuts to his head, which appeared to be caused by his helmet, and bled profusely. Hudler did however return to the game after recieving 10 stiches.
Last week in game 6 of the Washington Capitals / New York Rangers NHL Eastern Conference quater final series the Caps Donald Brashear leveled a hit on the Rangers Blair Betts that was almost identical in nature to the hit in tonights Ducks / Wings game. The NHL suspended Brashear for 5 games for the hit. Betts suffered a broken orbital bone, and did not return for the series.
I am posting video footage of both hits, and you can decide for yourself. It is my opinion that the hit Brown leveled tonight was almost no different than the one Brashear leveled last week. It is also my opinon that the NHL should suspend Brown for 5 games as well. While the injuries sustained were different, and the players leveling the hits may have somewhat different reputations, the NHL needs to show consistency here if they are going to attempt to take these kinds of hits out of the game of hockey. I should also qualify here, that it is also my opinion, that both hits were not "dirty" in nature. They may have been somewhat late, but neither were inherently "dirty".
S, you be the judge. Should the NHL suspend Brown as well, and if so, for how long? Here are the videos of each hit. Leave your comments with what you think.
I think the Brash hit should have gotten less games. The hit was dirty but their wasn't any blood. Then the Brown hit where he took a cheap shot and drew blood because I think the stick was involved. It just seemed like their was intent to injure.
I sure would just like some consistency from the NHL is all. I don't think either hit should be worthy of any suspension. Oh well, the NHL has "Spoken" on both, and I disagree with their punishment of Brashear, and their non punishment of Brown, but only because of the perceived precedent set by the punishment handed out to Brashear.
Welcome! I have been an avid Washington Capitals fan since 1977, when I attended my first game at Capital Centre, in Landover, MD, just 5 minutes from where I grew up in Bowie. I held season tickets from 81-92 there, in section 126, L. I then held season tickets from 99, until 07 at Verizon Center, first in 410 H, then in 408 E, then 408 A. This blog gets its name from where my seats have always been..."Behind The Goal Line". Being born and raised here in Washington, D.C. I also am an ardent & lifelong D.C. United, Nationals, and Redskins fan. This blog is not intended to be a "news" source, or anything of that nature, rather, it is just one lifelong fan and supporter's musings, opinions, thoughts, rants, perspectives, and observations on all things Caps, from on the ice, in the stands, to the front office, and around the NHL too. I will attempt to keep this updated as often as I can, so check back often as this is a work in progress. Click here for my profile.
3 comments:
wow, he deserves at least 5 games for that. Brash's hit on Betts looked way more innocent than that!! Let's be equal, no, Mr. Campbell!
I think the Brash hit should have gotten less games. The hit was dirty but their wasn't any blood. Then the Brown hit where he took a cheap shot and drew blood because I think the stick was involved. It just seemed like their was intent to injure.
I sure would just like some consistency from the NHL is all. I don't think either hit should be worthy of any suspension. Oh well, the NHL has "Spoken" on both, and I disagree with their punishment of Brashear, and their non punishment of Brown, but only because of the perceived precedent set by the punishment handed out to Brashear.
Post a Comment